« Just launched (A message from Tim Smith of Spark PR) | Main | A pair of troubling propositions »

June 24, 2007

That's one, no, that's two for you, Michelle Malkin

A while back someone on The Well chastised me for listing Michelle Malkin on my blogroll. He was even more incensed that Malkin was listed first. He said that was like placing the her "above the fold."

I responded that I read Malkin out of a perverse sense of duty - after all, I strongly disagree with her rants about 90 percent of the time.

Today's rant touched a nerve. Now, just because my nerves are touched doesn't mean that we ought to go and bomb hell out of Iran, no matter what the pretext. If we did bomb Iran, wouldn't we be killing some, or many, of those very same victims of that country's insane societal policies?

So, Michelle, I thank you for the eye-opener. And I agree with you that the mass media does need, in fact, is obligated to publish these photos. Let the world's condemnation help stop the madness in Iran.

Update - The honeymoon's over, Michelle. Already?

MM decides to blast MM (interesting, that) over the film "Sicko." What's the best she can do?
Pinko1


TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/t/trackback/5447/19560138

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference That's one, no, that's two for you, Michelle Malkin:

Comments

Post a comment

If you have a TypeKey or TypePad account, please Sign In